Skip to content

Image: Protecting our lenders against the unknown

We have been asked a numerous times this week whether the lender or the solicitors (on either side of the transaction) must to see their clients face to face. If you are a lender or solicitor acting in a transaction and taking advantage of our Perfect Title policy there is no requirement for face to face meetings in this time of recommended isolation.

As experts who cover fraud, we ask our insured clients to do some additional checks that go beyond the JMLSG guidelines, which enables us to offer comprehensive fraud cover to all of our clients. We ask you to meet one of only four additional requirements that are not onerous and should not delay proceedings to help mitigate any fraud risk:

  1. Talk to the borrower on the phone to clarify security questions only they can answer. We call this a “speak with”;
  2. Internet portal sign on. Borrowers must be registered via a secure verification process;
  3. Receive funds from a UK bank account in the clients name;
  4. A borrower’s written response to a letter sent to the borrower at their home address.

Important – Are your i’s dotted and t’s crossed?

The real risk that comes from distance conveyancing generally emanates from poor administration such as:

–       Did I have a mortgage deed on the day of completion? Yes

–       Did I check it was signed correctly? No

–       Did I check it was witnessed correctly? No

Provided that solicitors are being extra vigilant in checking the execution of documents (not the identity of who signed them) then unnecessary solicitor negligence claims can be avoided.

Chris Taylor

CEO, Titlesolv

Older news items

Inherent Rights of Access: Learning from Urquhart v J. Rhind & Co.

In Scottish property law, establishing a servitude right of access over neighbouring land often hinges on the principle of positive prescription, which requires open, peaceable, and uninterrupted use for 20 years. However, the recent case of Urquhart v J. Rhind & Co. at Elgin Sheriff Court has highlighted important considerations regarding inherent rights of necessity, especially for properties considered enclaves.

Read More

When is Salt Really a Metal: How Ambiguous Language Can Create Legal Complications 

A recent High Court judgment revealed an interesting perspective on the interpretation of contract clauses, specifically concerning the classification of certain minerals. The case revolved around reservations in four separate conveyances regarding the “mines, beds, and quarries of ironstone and iron ore and other metals.” The court was asked to determine whether this description of “other metals” included potash and rock salt.

Read More